Lydia PLANTAINS
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
The Fight For Childhood Obesity essay!!
Understanding the significant complex factors of the growing childhood obesity epidemic is quite important; not only for the improvement of the future generation’s health, but also for the healthcare system. Over the past three decades, overweight rates in our country have tripled to 17%. Childhood obesity has become one of the major issues, although it could be managed within health communities and federal government in the United States of America. Food marketing is both battling childhood obesity, but also causing it through for example, advertisements. In this essay I will discuss the causes as well as how to prevent obesity in young kids. One of the major contributions made by the government was the campaign started by First Lady Michelle Obama called “Let’s Move”, where she fights for the matter of the children of America through personally exercising with them, workshops and encourages the public that parental influence should not be ignored.
In medical studies, obesity is defined as a person having more than 20 percent body fat then their healthy range. Ideal weight takes into account height, age, sex, and build of a person. Obese children are at risk for numerous health problems during their youth and into adulthood. Obese children are more likely to have high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and Type 2 diabetes. “ Calling obesity an epidemic is one of the greatest threats to America’s health and economy” (Hellmich). Obesity is among the easiest medical conditions to recognize but most difficult to treat. Unhealthy weight gain due to poor diet and lack of exercise is responsible for over 300,000 deaths each year. The causes of obesity are complex and include genetic, biological, behavioral and cultural factors. Obesity in childhood and adolescence can be related to many things such as poor eating habits, lack of exercise, family and peer problems and the list continues. But with proper nutrition, exercise and support, children can lose the weight and develop healthy habits for life.
Statistically nowadays, 12.5 million children are overweight, which as I mentioned before, makes more than 17%. Decades ago children did not have so much access to television, computers and video games like they do now. That is one of the major impacts of why now children are obese. Then, the few entertainments kids could have had was playing sports outside, biking, swimming etc. Now, it is hard for parents who are working to freely allow their kids to play outside - they rather have them watch television or browse through the internet knowing they are safe at home. But what they don’t know is that this sedentary type of lifestyle will cost their children’s health, and after all, physical appearance. Today, obesity also contributes to psychological disorders like depression, bipolar disorder and social impairments. Even though we live in a country where we have so much diversity, there is still discrimination - against those who are obese for example - kids get picked on at school, playground and other public places.
Everyday we hear about how childhood obesity is on the raise and is making the new generation's life span shorter and shorter but people have come around and organizations in the U.S. and around the world are tackling the problem. First Lady Michelle Obama calls to fight childhood obesity, disregarding the aspect of physical appearance, but rather the quality of life. She launched “ Let’s Move”, a campaign to change the way we raise our children within the next generation. This campaign has a website that’s more than helpful for parents, teachers, physicians, coaches and kids to get involved. “Let’s Move” is going to have a major impact on children as well as adults because of it’s helpful tips and strategies on beating obesity in children. The most appealing part about this growing campaign is the recognizable food pyramid project which will offer tools to help the next generation put dietary guidelines into practice. The Federal Government will be involved with local officials and leaders in the business to provide more nutritious food in schools as well as more physical activities and access to more affordable and healthier foods for families with low income. Obama says, “We know we have the tools, we know we have the resources to make this happen” (Benac).
The most commonly asked questions parents should ask themselves is what is your child eating on a typical day? How much activity is your child getting? Are you willing to change your family’s lifestyle to help your child lose weight? These are all questions parents should be aware of when it comes to their children. The good news is that parents have a major influence over their child’s lifestyle and weight. Research has given us a lot of information about how parents can help their child reach a health weight. Even Michelle Obama, who began the “Let’s Move” campaign, admits as much. “ Before coming to the White House, the president and i lived like most families: two working parents- too busy, not enouph time, and i found myself unable to cook a good meal for my kids. Going to fast food more than i’d like, ordering pizza, and i started to see the effects on my family, particularly my kids” (Obama). Parental influence cannot be ignored, because children generally spend more time with their parents than with anybody else. With this major issue, not only Michelle Obama but also the government is hoping that parents and guardians take this new enforcment seriously and stricly follow through them. After all, this is for the best benefit of the children of our future generation.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Annotated Bibliography
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
LYDIA GARCIA
MY TOPIC WILL BE FOCUSED ON FOOD MARKETING IN BATTLE TO REDUCE CHILDHOOD OBESITY.
Bagchi, Debasis. Global Perspectives On Childhood Obesity, Current Status, Consequences, and Prevention. Amsterdam, Boston: Academic Press/ Elsevier, 2011. Print.
This book will cover the multi-faceted factors contributing to the rapidly growing childhood obesity epidemic. The strategies for childhood obesity prevention and treatment such as physical activity and exercise, personalized nutrition plans and school and community involvement will be presented.
Benac, Nancy. "United States shifts focus to food marketing in battle to reduce childhood obesity." CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 182.10 (2010): E459-E460. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 May 2011.
The article reports that U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama's fight against national childhood obesity shifts its focus on food marketing. It states that Obama announced Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation's voluntary cut of 1.5 trillion calories from its products by the end of 2015.
Obama,Michelle. The New York Times. Feb 8, 2011: 1-3. Print.
This article focuses on Michelle Obama's efforts on combatting childhood obesity, becoming involved in many aspects of the nations dietary habits and exerting her influence over nutrition policy.
Hellmich, Nanci. "Michelle Obama to launch initiative fighting child obesity". USA TODAY. Jan 20, 2011. Print.
Discusses ways of how to stop obesity. Requiring physical education in schools, recreational facilities, healthy diets, etc. Explains how Michelle Obama has interacted with kids on the lawn of the white house to promote children's health.
Hyunjae (Jay), Yu. "Parental Communication Style's Impact on Children's Attitudes Toward Obesity and Food Advertising." Journal of Consumer Affairs 45.1 (2011): 87-107. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 May 2011.
Among many possible factors, parental influence cannot be ignored, because children (7–12 years old) generally spend more time with their parents than with anybody else. This study investigates the possible influences of parental communication styles/patterns while watching TV with their children on their children’s obesity level (body mass index) as well as parental influence’s effect on children’s attitudes toward TV snack/fast-food ads.
Oliver, J Eric."Fat Politics: The Real Story Behind Americas Obesity Epidemic". Cary, NC, USA: Oxford University Press, 10/2005. Print.
How obesity became and epidemic disease. Unmaking the obesity epidemic.
LYDIA GARCIA
MY TOPIC WILL BE FOCUSED ON FOOD MARKETING IN BATTLE TO REDUCE CHILDHOOD OBESITY.
Bagchi, Debasis. Global Perspectives On Childhood Obesity, Current Status, Consequences, and Prevention. Amsterdam, Boston: Academic Press/ Elsevier, 2011. Print.
This book will cover the multi-faceted factors contributing to the rapidly growing childhood obesity epidemic. The strategies for childhood obesity prevention and treatment such as physical activity and exercise, personalized nutrition plans and school and community involvement will be presented.
Benac, Nancy. "United States shifts focus to food marketing in battle to reduce childhood obesity." CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 182.10 (2010): E459-E460. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 May 2011.
The article reports that U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama's fight against national childhood obesity shifts its focus on food marketing. It states that Obama announced Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation's voluntary cut of 1.5 trillion calories from its products by the end of 2015.
Obama,Michelle. The New York Times. Feb 8, 2011: 1-3. Print.
This article focuses on Michelle Obama's efforts on combatting childhood obesity, becoming involved in many aspects of the nations dietary habits and exerting her influence over nutrition policy.
Hellmich, Nanci. "Michelle Obama to launch initiative fighting child obesity". USA TODAY. Jan 20, 2011. Print.
Discusses ways of how to stop obesity. Requiring physical education in schools, recreational facilities, healthy diets, etc. Explains how Michelle Obama has interacted with kids on the lawn of the white house to promote children's health.
Hyunjae (Jay), Yu. "Parental Communication Style's Impact on Children's Attitudes Toward Obesity and Food Advertising." Journal of Consumer Affairs 45.1 (2011): 87-107. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 May 2011.
Among many possible factors, parental influence cannot be ignored, because children (7–12 years old) generally spend more time with their parents than with anybody else. This study investigates the possible influences of parental communication styles/patterns while watching TV with their children on their children’s obesity level (body mass index) as well as parental influence’s effect on children’s attitudes toward TV snack/fast-food ads.
Oliver, J Eric."Fat Politics: The Real Story Behind Americas Obesity Epidemic". Cary, NC, USA: Oxford University Press, 10/2005. Print.
How obesity became and epidemic disease. Unmaking the obesity epidemic.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Spring Break Supersize Me Response
Every single day we see people driving through McDonalds or Burger King. In reality, we never really notice how many people order meals. Those fast food places are always busy, stretching their working hours until night. Me, personally, I always used to use a drive through whenever I was hungry after a long night of going out. Now I come to realize that fast food isn't the healthiest thing there is even when you pick fresh choices. I always knew fast food was not the best choice of food, but watching Supersize Me really opened my eyes when I saw Morgan eating those unhealthy foods for a month and what kind of consequences he had to suffer. Heart attack, diabetes, increased levels of cholesterol, lack of vitamins etc. What struck me the most was to see those meals in glass jars and their expiration dates. Fast food merchants put so many chemicals into the food that it appears ready to eat after several weeks. In my opinion, that's disgusting. Myself I was a victim of a fast food poisoning, I was diagnosed with a stomach virus very recently - trust me, it is not the most pleasant thing in the world.
Supersize Me was technically a tragedy since I found out the main actor passed away. This should be an alarm to people, and children not to make fast foods your priority. Even though their food is cheap and filling, there are barely any nutritional supplements in them. Why do you think Morgan threw up from eating fast food all the time? Because your own body and your own stomach recognizes that this is not healthy for you and it is harming you with all the chemicals and trans fats in them. After seeing Supersize Me and on top of that, getting a stomach virus made me realize that I should not touch fast food ever again, unless I’m starving.
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
5 sources of research
1. Grabbing as much information from my great grandmother explaining how the food was raised and prepared. How its changed or not changed
2. The movie Food Ink. in which they discuss how they got their food which is different to how we get our food now in 2011. As well as how their meat, milk, and spices were different.
3. Using the internet where they have the different recipes of puerto rican food. websites such as
http://www.topuertorico.org/cocina/
4. fast food nation pg.193. where the meat comes from. how people got sick with eating this type of food because of the chemicals in them.
5. cookbook. Puerto Rican Cookery. recipes of different spanish foods.
2. The movie Food Ink. in which they discuss how they got their food which is different to how we get our food now in 2011. As well as how their meat, milk, and spices were different.
3. Using the internet where they have the different recipes of puerto rican food. websites such as
http://www.topuertorico.org/cocina/
4. fast food nation pg.193. where the meat comes from. how people got sick with eating this type of food because of the chemicals in them.
5. cookbook. Puerto Rican Cookery. recipes of different spanish foods.
Thursday, March 24, 2011
paper 1
Lydia Garcia
Eng 101: Composition 1
Throughout history people have consistently invented new and creative technology to improve the way we eat. Despite many differences, people in 1911 and 2011 have many similarities. The method in which food is prepared, bought, and eaten has vastly changed, but the way people eat according to their social class has not.
The difference in which food was prepared is that they used big steal pots and place them over a fire or would hang them on a chain over the fireplace. It was only the more of wealthiest of households that can afford to install and run an oven. Unlike now in 2011 we use gas stoves to cook all of our food. On the other hand the way food was bought is different as well. They killed animals to get meat. In our time now we have supermarkets to buy our food from. Lastly is how our food was eaten that was a major difference. 100 years ago there was no seasoned food and everything was mostly eaten raw. It was definitely fresh meat but tasted very plain. People would migrate around bodies of water like rivers and lakes because water was a big necessity and was good to hunt around for food. They ate as a family all of the time there was no such thing as restaurants.
There are similarities that have not changed. It’s the different types of social class from 1911 till now. There have always been the higher class families and the more lower class. There hasn’t been any change with that because the rich still ate lavishly and the poor had trouble seeking their food and had a more difficult way of living. In 1911 they still had what we have now to live and that goes for, most importantly having water to drink, having meat to eat whether it was cooked differently or not they still had there ways of producing food that we still have today in 2011. Farming and crops of fruits and vegetables are still the same but now we have large farms that produce for massive populations and is exported and imported from around the world while in 1911 their crops were grown individually.
My ancestor Jesenia Cruz Fuentes from San Juan Puerto Rico was someone I didn’t know personally but heard much about and learned how her food was raised, bought, prepared, and eaten. I learned it hearing from my great grandmother who was raised in that era. It was very much different and similar from the way I eat today. My main meals eaten daily is macaroni and cheese, pizza, arroz con gandules ( Puerto Rican rice and pigeon peas), steak , white rice and eggs, pan con queso ( bread and cheese) etc. I personally always eat out at restaurants where the food is made or at home where my grandmother cooks for the family. One hundred years ago it was very family oriented. Food was always cooked at home and always eaten together at a table. They had no refrigeration so they would take the meat they killed and dig a whole in the ground to where it was cool enouph to keep it as fresh as possible. This is why people came out with a lot of diseases because of the dirt that they surrounded there food with.
In conclusion patterns of eating in Puerto Rico have not changed as much as you think. Although there lie many differences in the way they ate as opposed to the way we eat and prepare the food, similarities in social class still exist till this day. Even after one hundred years you can still see that the Puerto Rican culture of food has had a large impact on our nation and the diversity in which it consists of.
Eng 101: Composition 1
Throughout history people have consistently invented new and creative technology to improve the way we eat. Despite many differences, people in 1911 and 2011 have many similarities. The method in which food is prepared, bought, and eaten has vastly changed, but the way people eat according to their social class has not.
The difference in which food was prepared is that they used big steal pots and place them over a fire or would hang them on a chain over the fireplace. It was only the more of wealthiest of households that can afford to install and run an oven. Unlike now in 2011 we use gas stoves to cook all of our food. On the other hand the way food was bought is different as well. They killed animals to get meat. In our time now we have supermarkets to buy our food from. Lastly is how our food was eaten that was a major difference. 100 years ago there was no seasoned food and everything was mostly eaten raw. It was definitely fresh meat but tasted very plain. People would migrate around bodies of water like rivers and lakes because water was a big necessity and was good to hunt around for food. They ate as a family all of the time there was no such thing as restaurants.
There are similarities that have not changed. It’s the different types of social class from 1911 till now. There have always been the higher class families and the more lower class. There hasn’t been any change with that because the rich still ate lavishly and the poor had trouble seeking their food and had a more difficult way of living. In 1911 they still had what we have now to live and that goes for, most importantly having water to drink, having meat to eat whether it was cooked differently or not they still had there ways of producing food that we still have today in 2011. Farming and crops of fruits and vegetables are still the same but now we have large farms that produce for massive populations and is exported and imported from around the world while in 1911 their crops were grown individually.
My ancestor Jesenia Cruz Fuentes from San Juan Puerto Rico was someone I didn’t know personally but heard much about and learned how her food was raised, bought, prepared, and eaten. I learned it hearing from my great grandmother who was raised in that era. It was very much different and similar from the way I eat today. My main meals eaten daily is macaroni and cheese, pizza, arroz con gandules ( Puerto Rican rice and pigeon peas), steak , white rice and eggs, pan con queso ( bread and cheese) etc. I personally always eat out at restaurants where the food is made or at home where my grandmother cooks for the family. One hundred years ago it was very family oriented. Food was always cooked at home and always eaten together at a table. They had no refrigeration so they would take the meat they killed and dig a whole in the ground to where it was cool enouph to keep it as fresh as possible. This is why people came out with a lot of diseases because of the dirt that they surrounded there food with.
In conclusion patterns of eating in Puerto Rico have not changed as much as you think. Although there lie many differences in the way they ate as opposed to the way we eat and prepare the food, similarities in social class still exist till this day. Even after one hundred years you can still see that the Puerto Rican culture of food has had a large impact on our nation and the diversity in which it consists of.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Food Inc.
I grew up watching my grandfather slaughter chickens in Puerto Rico. He used to do it in a very certain way. He would take the white chicken by its legs and cut their throats. Of course my grandmother covered my eyes for that. I was a very young girl back then and I was very interested in what my grandfather was doing. He would take out its feathers first, then burn the chicken itself so it doesn't have any feathers left. Once the corpse was cleaned, he would call me over and show me different organs because he wanted to show me the internal anatomy of the chicken. He showed me the chicken's liver, then he showed me its stomach - and then he opened it up to show me what the chickens were eating - it was funny because all I saw was a greenish-yellowish paste with rocks in between. Then he took out the heart.
I was amused by Food Inc. because of the way they have slaughtered the chickens. It looks like a torture not only for the animals, but also for the farmers. Usually, people in the United States of America do not care where their food comes from, but I strongly suggest for everyone to watch this movie. It shows the realities of agricultural hardships, what farmers have to upgrade from their usual traditions to what the companies implied them to do so. Throughout the movie, what has caught my attention the most, was a woman whose contract with a company was terminated because she did not want to change the setting of her "chicken house". Also the figurative numbers shown in the movie, what kind of debt the farmers have to go into to build such a house was anywhere from $300,000 - $500,000 where their yearly income was only $18,000.
Now I am debating whether or not should I be a vegetarian. :)
I was amused by Food Inc. because of the way they have slaughtered the chickens. It looks like a torture not only for the animals, but also for the farmers. Usually, people in the United States of America do not care where their food comes from, but I strongly suggest for everyone to watch this movie. It shows the realities of agricultural hardships, what farmers have to upgrade from their usual traditions to what the companies implied them to do so. Throughout the movie, what has caught my attention the most, was a woman whose contract with a company was terminated because she did not want to change the setting of her "chicken house". Also the figurative numbers shown in the movie, what kind of debt the farmers have to go into to build such a house was anywhere from $300,000 - $500,000 where their yearly income was only $18,000.
Now I am debating whether or not should I be a vegetarian. :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)